FireWire vs. USB 2.0
Performance Comparison - FireWire vs. USB 2.0 Read and indite tests to the same IDE hornlike intend adjoining using FireWire and then USB 2.0 show:
Read Test:
As the action comparison shown above confirms, FireWire relic the action leader. And is the prizewinning choice for DV camcorders, digital frequence and video devices, outside hornlike drives, high-performance DVD burners and any other figure that demands constant high action throughput.
FireWire - Still the Performance King!
Need to enter a FireWire figure or a USB figure and you don't hit the pertinent programme on your computer? With a band card, you crapper add both opening types at once: See: FireWire & USB 2.0 PCI Card, USB Firewire CardBus Card, FireWire USB 2.0 ExpressCard 34
Question: USB 2.0 is faster than FireWire...right?
Answer: No, actually FireWire is faster than USB 2.0.
Answer: No, actually FireWire is faster than USB 2.0.
Question: Hold on...USB 2.0 is a 480 Mbps programme and FireWire is a 400 Mbps interface, how crapper FireWire be faster?
Answer: Raw throughput rating drawing alone don't tell the whole story, as explained below.
The throughput drawing would advance you to conceive that USB 2.0 provides better performance. But, differences in the structure of the two interfaces hit a Brobdingnagian impact on the actual uninterrupted "real world" throughput. And for those hunt high-performance, uninterrupted throughput is what it's every most (reading and composition files to an outside hornlike intend for example).
Architecture - FireWire vs. USB 2.0
Answer: Raw throughput rating drawing alone don't tell the whole story, as explained below.
The throughput drawing would advance you to conceive that USB 2.0 provides better performance. But, differences in the structure of the two interfaces hit a Brobdingnagian impact on the actual uninterrupted "real world" throughput. And for those hunt high-performance, uninterrupted throughput is what it's every most (reading and composition files to an outside hornlike intend for example).
Architecture - FireWire vs. USB 2.0
- FireWire, built from the ground up for speed, uses a "Peer-to-Peer" structure in which the peripherals are nimble and crapper discuss charabanc conflicts to watch which figure crapper prizewinning curb a accumulation transfer
- USB 2.0 uses a "Master-Slave" structure in which the machine handles every arbitration functions and dictates accumulation line to, from and between the attached peripherals (adding additional grouping disbursement and resulting in slower, less-efficient accumulation line control)
Read Test:
- 5000 files (300 MB total) FireWire was 33% faster than USB 2.0
- 160 files (650MB total) FireWire was 70% faster than USB 2.0
- 5000 files (300 MB total) FireWire was 16% faster than USB 2.0
- 160 files (650MB total) FireWire was 48% faster than USB 2.0
As the action comparison shown above confirms, FireWire relic the action leader. And is the prizewinning choice for DV camcorders, digital frequence and video devices, outside hornlike drives, high-performance DVD burners and any other figure that demands constant high action throughput.
No comments:
Post a Comment